Below is the ICQ log dating back to December 2008, featuring the conversation between Slava Makarov (currently lead producer of Wargaming.net), Peter Bityukov (hisrorical consultant), before their meeting with well-known Victor Kislyi (CEO) - "fathers of tanks". That's probably the moment when WoT has been born. :)
So let's get to it. :) My comments are in italics.
Slava Makarov (15:48:37 10/12/2008)
Let's suggest WG to make a mech game on their engine :)
Gigantic androids! that will guard the borders of Russian Federation :)
Peter Bityukov (15:49:16 10/12/2008)
:) btw, have you seen their engine? I mean Bagration (also Order of War - Overlord)
Slava (15:50:39 10/12/2008)
Not yet. I have seen only Inhabited island (another WG's old game, see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoners_of_Power - Overlord)
Petr (16:07:51 10/12/2008)
The current engine is much better. It does look modern. http://www.bagration-game.ru/ You can check the screenshots here (unfortunately, not anymore :( - Overlord ).
Slava (16:08:23 10/12/2008)
Found it, yup, looks good.
Petr (16:08:33 10/12/2008)
plus it's not the only their engine :) they have got a few more :)
Slava (16:08:51 10/12/2008)
O, yeah! About mechs, huuge, human-like, steam! In the setting of the 30ies!
The Whites (see Civil War in Russia, eg here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_movement - Overlord) won and began to produce motorcuirasses instead of tanks!!!
Petr (16:09:36 10/12/2008)
will try to talk to him now
Petr (16:11:14 10/12/2008)
they have got a few ideas on the new project, Victor said we would discuss it in person. Personally I'm thinking of high-quality navy (Navy Field like game - Overlord), but there is a problem because of NF2.
Slava (16:12:46 10/12/2008)
will have to do it about WWI
Petr (16:14:15 10/12/2008)
NF2's timeline is rumoured to begin since the early XX. :(
Already thought of that.
Slava (16:14:29 10/12/2008)
one more option is navyfield about tanks
Petr (16:14:44 10/12/2008)
squadron battles would be even more realistic there
I suggested navyfield with tanks to them like one year ago :)
MMO based on Order of War engine
with progression and upgrades
well, we can discuss it during the meeting anyway :)
Slava (16:16:55 10/12/2008)
it sounds nice - we have already got the models
progression scheme would be - lights-meds-heavies
Petr (16:17:14 10/12/2008)
i like it too
Petr (16:17:16 10/12/2008)
yup, plus we can make some lines / branches
Slava (16:17:27 10/12/2008)
yes, side lines like - spgs and rocket launchers
Petr (16:17:33 10/12/2008)
tank destroyers or even infantry
Slava (16:17:46 10/12/2008)
nope, infantry would only complicate things. totally different setting
Petr (16:17:59 10/12/2008)
full of heavy armament
Slava (16:18:21 10/12/2008)
APCs as aircraft carrier? :))) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armoured_personnel_carrier - Overlord)
Petr (16:18:43 10/12/2008)
:)
Petr (16:20:05 10/12/2008)
some more to the tank idea - additional armour plates, engine upgrades, guns
what's your opinion on navyfield with sailing vessels? does it make any sense?
Slava (16:26:10 10/12/2008)
won't work out because of the wind
Petr (16:26:11 10/12/2008)
with winds and currents
too much for players?
Slava (16:28:32 10/12/2008)
yup, plus we will have to compete with corsairs (series of naval games for PC, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Pirates:_Caribbean_Tales as expample - Overlord)
tanks sound more promising
plus we have got a set of models
Petr (16:39:02 10/12/2008)
I like the tank concept as well
Slava (16:49:10 10/12/2008)
SuperHeavyTank - Maus, IS-7, Conqueror, M103
Petr (16:49:50 10/12/2008)
:-)
aye! and ΠΆ-27 too;) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-27 - Overlord)
Slava (16:51:28 10/12/2008)
no, Renault FT
everyone used it
and it was a piece of crap
Petr (16:52:44 10/12/2008)
:-D
Slava (16:53:38 10/12/2008)
don't like the idea of APCs as aircraft carrier since if scouting depended on such small fry, navy would be totally different, but interesting
Petr (16:54:12 10/12/2008)
artillery as aircraft carrier
Slava (16:54:24 10/12/2008)
this is!
Petr (16:54:26 10/12/2008)
probably even heavy self-propelled guns
Slava (16:54:35 10/12/2008)
different self-propelled vehicles and rocket launchers
Petr (16:55:39 10/12/2008)
Priest, Hummel
as for the Soviets
SU-122, SU-152 and ISU-152
could fire being in defilade position
but had little ammo and excess armour
though it might even work well as a unique feature of the faction
Petr (21:00:26 10/12/2008)
Victor will be in Moscow on Friday
Slava (21:00:35 10/12/2008)
niiice
And that was only the beginning. :)
So let's get to it. :) My comments are in italics.
Slava Makarov (15:48:37 10/12/2008)
Let's suggest WG to make a mech game on their engine :)
Gigantic androids! that will guard the borders of Russian Federation :)
Peter Bityukov (15:49:16 10/12/2008)
:) btw, have you seen their engine? I mean Bagration (also Order of War - Overlord)
Slava (15:50:39 10/12/2008)
Not yet. I have seen only Inhabited island (another WG's old game, see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoners_of_Power - Overlord)
Petr (16:07:51 10/12/2008)
The current engine is much better. It does look modern. http://www.bagration-game.ru/ You can check the screenshots here (unfortunately, not anymore :( - Overlord ).
Slava (16:08:23 10/12/2008)
Found it, yup, looks good.
Petr (16:08:33 10/12/2008)
plus it's not the only their engine :) they have got a few more :)
Slava (16:08:51 10/12/2008)
O, yeah! About mechs, huuge, human-like, steam! In the setting of the 30ies!
The Whites (see Civil War in Russia, eg here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_movement - Overlord) won and began to produce motorcuirasses instead of tanks!!!
Petr (16:09:36 10/12/2008)
will try to talk to him now
Petr (16:11:14 10/12/2008)
they have got a few ideas on the new project, Victor said we would discuss it in person. Personally I'm thinking of high-quality navy (Navy Field like game - Overlord), but there is a problem because of NF2.
Slava (16:12:46 10/12/2008)
will have to do it about WWI
Petr (16:14:15 10/12/2008)
NF2's timeline is rumoured to begin since the early XX. :(
Already thought of that.
Slava (16:14:29 10/12/2008)
one more option is navyfield about tanks
Petr (16:14:44 10/12/2008)
squadron battles would be even more realistic there
I suggested navyfield with tanks to them like one year ago :)
MMO based on Order of War engine
with progression and upgrades
well, we can discuss it during the meeting anyway :)
Slava (16:16:55 10/12/2008)
it sounds nice - we have already got the models
progression scheme would be - lights-meds-heavies
Petr (16:17:14 10/12/2008)
i like it too
Petr (16:17:16 10/12/2008)
yup, plus we can make some lines / branches
Slava (16:17:27 10/12/2008)
yes, side lines like - spgs and rocket launchers
Petr (16:17:33 10/12/2008)
tank destroyers or even infantry
Slava (16:17:46 10/12/2008)
nope, infantry would only complicate things. totally different setting
Petr (16:17:59 10/12/2008)
full of heavy armament
Slava (16:18:21 10/12/2008)
APCs as aircraft carrier? :))) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armoured_personnel_carrier - Overlord)
Petr (16:18:43 10/12/2008)
:)
Petr (16:20:05 10/12/2008)
some more to the tank idea - additional armour plates, engine upgrades, guns
what's your opinion on navyfield with sailing vessels? does it make any sense?
Slava (16:26:10 10/12/2008)
won't work out because of the wind
Petr (16:26:11 10/12/2008)
with winds and currents
too much for players?
Slava (16:28:32 10/12/2008)
yup, plus we will have to compete with corsairs (series of naval games for PC, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Pirates:_Caribbean_Tales as expample - Overlord)
tanks sound more promising
plus we have got a set of models
Petr (16:39:02 10/12/2008)
I like the tank concept as well
Slava (16:49:10 10/12/2008)
SuperHeavyTank - Maus, IS-7, Conqueror, M103
Petr (16:49:50 10/12/2008)
:-)
aye! and ΠΆ-27 too;) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-27 - Overlord)
Slava (16:51:28 10/12/2008)
no, Renault FT
everyone used it
and it was a piece of crap
Petr (16:52:44 10/12/2008)
:-D
Slava (16:53:38 10/12/2008)
don't like the idea of APCs as aircraft carrier since if scouting depended on such small fry, navy would be totally different, but interesting
Petr (16:54:12 10/12/2008)
artillery as aircraft carrier
Slava (16:54:24 10/12/2008)
this is!
Petr (16:54:26 10/12/2008)
probably even heavy self-propelled guns
Slava (16:54:35 10/12/2008)
different self-propelled vehicles and rocket launchers
Petr (16:55:39 10/12/2008)
Priest, Hummel
as for the Soviets
SU-122, SU-152 and ISU-152
could fire being in defilade position
but had little ammo and excess armour
though it might even work well as a unique feature of the faction
Petr (21:00:26 10/12/2008)
Victor will be in Moscow on Friday
Slava (21:00:35 10/12/2008)
niiice
And that was only the beginning. :)
I like this convo. and how things now are part of the game now like the Renault FT, it finally made it to the game. And as said in 2008 is crap. lol
ReplyDeleteHah! Wargaming admitted that Renault FT sucks! I demand a buff for my Renault FT! Add 700 HP and a 150 mm cannon to it!!!
ReplyDeletej/k :)
I liked 30's steam mecha idea :)
ReplyDeleteI do hope you pick that up at soe point in the future.
conqueror :)
ReplyDeletewe want british tanks - he didnt answer about british tanks in the current soviet tree? is it just going the be british (original) variants of current soviet tanks?
ReplyDeletewe were first to use tanks!
In British tree those are going to be upgradeable, as for their Soviet buddies, prolly some/all of them will be removed from the store.
Deletejust as with the captured frenchies prems
Deletelol, i like that discussion on Navyfield.. as me being involved partially in the Balancing of the real Navyfield in EU.
ReplyDeleteI really hope these few sentences about NF are an indicator of getting WOB with the same basic gameplay as navyfield has/had.
Id really love to participate in the alpha if it arrives.. overlord please reserve a seat for a Navyfield balancing vet ;)
I think i can be useful
Ok, ok. :) Though alpha is not likely to start this year.
DeleteSo because of Slava WoT wont have infantry?
ReplyDeleteSlava (16:17:46 10/12/2008)
nope, infantry would only complicate things. totally different setting
I dont like Slava -.-
:D
I kinda agree with him, infantry is not really needed in WoT. :)
DeleteO.O Thats the answer I wanted to hear *Evil laughing*
DeleteThen why was in the latest blog post a designer who made a soldier, when "infantry is not really needed in WoT"?
Sorry Overlord..but Gotcha!
So..When is World of Infantry alpha?
:DD
I would like to see bunkers that would fire at all tanks, or assit in deffence, or be placeable at the begining of the match
ReplyDeletecobra9431
ICQ? Who still uses ICQ in the current time (or even 2008) :P
ReplyDeletethose guys are stone age neanderthal men :)
DeleteGreat post! Thanks a lot.. nice to see. :)
ReplyDeleteBTW any chance that just for the fun of it you bring 30 vs. 30 battles to the test server? It's standing empty most of the time, why not use to test these things... :) I'm sure you'll have a hard time finding 60 QA people to be doing testing full time just on this, where's on the test server you can easily find 20k testers. :)
Only after we solve all performance issues, that's the problem.
Deleteany chance that platoons of 4 could be implemented in such big games? i know they were balance breaking in 15 vs 15, but maybe they wont in 30 vs 30
DeleteOnly if we enable 30vs30 battles, not for the current format.
DeleteWhen was it decided to make the Germans pay over half a century later by gimping their tanks at every chance? Did you guys specifically look for people who still hate Germany and wanted to write a russian-love-letter via pixels, or were they working for you guys already?
ReplyDeleteI wish I could say I'm just busting, but honest to god you guys are crazy. Seriously. Even to this very day with patch 7.5 you purposely gimped German tanks again so they're less competitive than everyone else. The JPZE100 is suffering even on the RU server, bad, like 8% bad. And the E50M has been turned down in CWs for every other T10 medium.
Seriously, knock this crap off. It's old. I want a competitive game, not a piece of propaganda. I'm just tired of it.
I hate to say this, but I wish another dev would step up to the plate, a AAA dev at that, and put WoT down. I've had fun, but I can't deal with the bias any longer. At least I'll have Guild Wars 2 to keep me busy.
seconded on the german stuff... im bored checking the patchnoted seeing nerfs disguised as "buffs" (check e100's gun on 7.5).
DeleteHow are the new T10 Mediums performing? Best/worst medium is......?
ReplyDeleteQuite good on average. In my opinion M48 is in the lead atm.
Deletewe need a map like paschendele with lots of destructible (dont know if is the correct word) buildings
ReplyDeletevery interesting..where can I find the Russian original?..I want to translate it into German..
ReplyDeleteHi Overlord,
ReplyDeleteI have 2 questions:
1.Can we expect the second medium lines (I think it's only for Germany and France) this year?
2.Is the Jagdpanzer E-100 underperforming compared to other tier 10 TDs?
Thanks.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteBy the sound of it, World of Warships is a game that Wargaming.net has wanted to make since the very beginning of the World of Tanks project :P
DeleteThe ordinary bat that flies around at night, who is a remarkable nim in the air, cannot take off from a level place firefall gold, If it is placed on the floor or flat ground, all it can do is to shuffle about helplessly and, no doubt, painfully fire fall gold, until it reaches some slight elevation from which it can throw itself into the air. Then, at once, it takes off like a flash firefall gold.
ReplyDeleteWhat a lovely and inspirational post - and an outstanding reminder! For singles and wedded females alike. I especially love the focus on the solemnity of the sacrifice at a time when (I imagine) it's very easy for a bride to get swept away in bridal manufacturing hoopla.Elite Introduction Agency Russian love
ReplyDelete